However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 6, 2013, at around 06:20, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (23 years of age) such as the closed scarf, scoke, etc. requiring treatment for about 28 days on several occasions, on the ground that the victim E (23 years of age) was in dispute with the Defendant’s female-friendly Gu. However, the victim E (23 years of age) went beyond one time as a drinking part of the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a photograph of damage and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the sentencing reason under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is not good in light of the background and contents of the crime in this case, the degree of injury of the victim is not weak, and the defendant has been punished twice as violent crime, etc., the defendant must be punished strictly, but it appears that the defendant has a depth of his/her mistake, the fact that the defendant deposits the victim as the victim on June 20, 201, the fact that he/she deposited five million won as the victim on June 20, 201, the fact that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and all other circumstances of this case, the punishment as ordered shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the circumstances of this case.