교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
The above defendant did not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a FCA110-wheeled vehicle.
On April 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above two-wheeled vehicle at around 23:06, and tried to enter the intersections located in the three-lane of the Sincheon-si fire station in the special zone of the government office, along the three-lanes in the direction of the central park in the direction of the government office.
Since there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of driving the two-wheeled vehicle, has a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and safely drive the two-wheeled vehicle in accordance with good faith.
Despite the fact that yellow light of vehicle signal, etc. has been turned out on the front side, the Defendant did not find the victim B (57 S) driving G operating a taxi in the opposite direction to the intersection due to the direct fault and negligence of entering the intersection, and did not find the taxi vehicle in the opposite direction, and shocked the back part of the said taxi vehicle into the front part of the said wheeling vehicle.
As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties, satise and satise in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the business of driving a taxi vehicle by obtaining a franchise from G.
On April 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi vehicle around 23:06, and was waiting for a signal at the first-lane in order to make a U.S. in front of the exit of the government near the intersection located in the Samyang-dong fire station in the Taecheon-si and the 11th century in the office building.
At this point, it is an intersection where signal lights are installed and a road where pedestrians' signal lights are available. Therefore, the defendant, who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely by displaying the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty
The defendant has been showing red signal on the vehicle signal, etc. but pedestrian signal, etc. has continued to be red, but it is at the intersection in the opposite lane due to the negligence of the U.S. in spite of continuous red signal.