No one shall make money exchange, arrange for money exchange or repurchase with other tangible and intangible results obtained through game products as a business.

Nevertheless, from June 20, 2013 to June 24, 2013, the Defendant received items cards from many unspecified customers using the above game site, received 9,000 won after deducting 10% of the fee per item card from the business owner, and exchanged the said cash by again delivering it to the customers. In return, the Defendant received items cards from the customers.

2. The fact that the police statement, the H’s statement, etc. of judgment G are consistent with the above facts charged, and the defendant also did not dispute to the business owner C with the fact that the item card for exchange (the Dok) was exchanged with the other customers. However, the defendant did not engage in such an act as a business, but did not engage in the act as a business, but did not intend to exchange the item card for exchange to the business owner when the game was exchanged to the business owner, while the game was carried out as a customer, the defendant did not merely interfere with the exchange of the item card for exchange with the same kind of item card for the customers who had a friendly relationship while carrying on the game, and did not acquire the price for exchange from the customers.

However, C, the owner of the business, can make consistent statements from the discovery to the prosecution, and the item card has two items, and the item card for exchange with which seal is affixed is kept without being entrusted to F, etc. employees, unless there is an urgent reason.