Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Reasons

A. It is difficult to deem that a labor contract was concluded with the content that should be paid. As seen earlier, each of the instant labor contracts is written with the Defendant’s signature, and there is no part in which the Defendant written, and even according to the Defendant’s statement, E appears to have obtained C’s seal affixed on a labor contract under the name of C from the Defendant and possessed for a considerable period of time. D’s seal affixed on a labor contract under the name of D is also deemed to have been used at any time due to a seal affixed on the office H’s book page because E is not good for the Defendant and thus, it is difficult to avoid the possibility that the Defendant prepared each of the instant labor contracts at will while leaving the office.