2. The first offense appears to be against the Defendant, and the first offense is the first offense. However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, a real estate brokerage assistant, by forging a lease contract, and by deceiving 65 million won, and was recovered by 20 million won out of the amount of defraudation, but this was reflected in the sentencing of the lower court, and other losses have not been recovered, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.