2. The costs of the lawsuit include the part resulting from the participation of the defendant intervenor.

A. On February 8, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with the Intervenor engaging in taxi transportation business, and joined the Intervenor company and served as a taxi driver. On May 5, 2017, the Intervenor notified the Plaintiff of the revocation of employment on the grounds delineated below.

(hereinafter “Revocation of Employment”) A.

The suspension of operation on a fake shall not be mandatory as specified in the Passenger Transport Service Act, but shall, notwithstanding which it has become an individual's interest, have become an act to acquire the individual's interest.

(b) a.

After the establishment of the party company, "an accident that causes trouble in the bridge between the bridges" was caused by an example after the establishment of the party company.

C. A civil petition filed several times against surrounding articles due to a violation of signal, transmission, etc., even after they were not against this,

(d) even through call centers, the civil petition of the “unfair charge collection” from passengers using the vehicle has been filed several times with the light view and call center;

E. As of May 2, 2017, a civil petition was filed from a female passenger working in the Home Packer by “doha and Intimidation”, etc.

B. On May 17, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that the said revocation of employment was unfair, and filed an application for remedy with the Busan Regional Labor Relations Commission. However, on July 14, 2017, the Plaintiff was decided to dismiss the said application.

On August 14, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an application for review seeking revocation of the above dismissal decision with the National Labor Relations Commission, but the National Labor Relations Commission rejected the application for reexamination on October 11, 2017.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant decision on reexamination”). C.

The labor contract between the plaintiff and the intervenor and the parts relating to this case in the collective agreement and rules of employment of the intervenor company are as follows:

The following collective agreements shall include trade unions and intervenors to which not less than half of the Intervenor’s workers belong: