A. From June 2, 2008 to December 31, 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that, while performing his/her duties, “satisfying and power damage by hand and the left-hand hand,” the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant, but decided not to grant medical care from the Defendant, but the medical care was completed on July 2, 201 after obtaining medical care approval from the Defendant after the decision on revocation of the said decision became final and conclusive.

B. On March 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and disease approval with the Defendant on the part of the Damage and Tunnels post-more (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”), the escape certificate of the conical signboard (No. 5-6), the escape certificate of the conical signboard, and (i) the (ii) the (iii) the (iv) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) the (v) judgment on the cancellation

C. On October 19, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a claim for medical care expenses and temporary layoff benefits with the Defendant from July 3, 2011 to May 22, 2017. However, on October 24, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to pay the Plaintiff the medical care expenses and temporary layoff benefits for the remainder of the period (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant dispositions”) on the basis of the result of the Defendant’s advisory panel’s consultation.

On February 1, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Defendant for each of the instant dispositions, but the Defendant rendered a decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request for examination.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, 9 through 14, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. On August 22, 2009, the Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff appeared to the right handman symptoms.