beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015. 02. 12. 선고 2014가단70088 판결

(무변론)체납자의 채권을 압류한 세무서장은 체납자의 채무자에게 체납자를 대위하여 채무이행을 촉구할 수 있음[국승]

Title

(A) The director of the tax office who seizes the claims of the defaulted taxpayer may demand the defaulted taxpayer to fulfill his obligations by subrogation of the defaulted taxpayer.

Summary

When the head of a tax office notifies of the attachment as a disposition for arrears, he/she may demand the garnishee to perform the obligation in subrogation of the obligee who is the defaulted taxpayer within the delinquent amount, and if the garnishee fails to perform the obligation, he/she may bring an action against the third obligor.

Related statutes

Article 41 (Procedures for Attachment of Claims)

Cases

2014dan70088 Collections

Plaintiff-Appellant

Korea

Defendant-Appellee

Yellow AA

The second instance decision

Conclusion of Pleadings

Pleadings without Oral Proceedings

Imposition of Judgment

February 12, 2015

Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 91,176,760 won with 20% interest per annum from December 18, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

Cheong-gu Office

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings: Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Grounds of Claim

1. Basic facts

A. Non-party LAA (CC)’s failure to pay national taxes

On October 10, 2014, LAA (CC) defaulted on 15 items, including value-added tax, and 128,961,730 won (including additional 24,317,520 won), as follows (A evidence 1).

Table 1 < by Presidential Decree No. 2583, Oct. 10, 2014>

(unit: Won)

Items of Taxation

Date of Notification

Deadline for payment

Notice Tax Amount

Amount in arrears

Value-added Tax

September 6, 2011

October 31, 201

3,008,770

4,594,430

Value-added Tax

March 8, 2012

March 31, 2012

14,593,070

20,284,160

Global Income Tax

August 3, 2012

August 31, 2012

3,690,230

4,907,930

Value-added Tax

September 4, 2012

September 30, 2012

18,966,100

24,997,240

Global Income Tax

November 1, 2012

November 30, 2012

1,845,110

2,387,540

Value-added Tax

March 5, 2013

March 31, 2013

32,540,830

38,401,690

Global Income Tax

August 7, 2013

August 31, 2013

2,327,670

2,760,590

Value-added Tax

September 5, 2013

September 30, 2013

7,058,170

8,286,190

Party A’s neighboring tax

September 6, 2013

September 30, 2013

120,490

124,100

Value-added Tax

October 1, 2013

October 25, 2013

3,307,000

3,842,690

Global Income Tax

November 1, 2013

November 30, 2013

2,086,000

2,398,880

Value-added Tax

March 7, 2014

March 31, 2014

5,868,880

6,467,460

Global Income Tax

August 6, 2014

August 31, 2014

625,320

644,070

Value-added Tax

September 2, 2014

September 30, 2014

8,606,570

8,864,760

guidance.

104,644,210

128,961,730

(b) Claim against the order for payment of the court's price for goods against the defendant of the leastA;

In taking a disposition on default of national taxes against LA, it was known that LA has a claim for payment order issued by the court against the outstanding amount of goods in business transactions with the defendant 91,176,760 won.

(c) Disposition on default (registration, seizure and notification);

In accordance with Article 41 of the National Tax Collection Act, the head of the Goyang District Tax Office under the Plaintiff’s jurisdiction attached a claim against the Defendant of the largestA on September 1, 2014 for the payment of the national taxes in arrears of the Republic of Korea, and notified the Defendant of September 2, 2014 (Notice of Attachment of Evidence No. 3), and on September 11, 2014, the notification of attachment was served on the Defendant (certificate No. 4).

D. Defendant’s non-performance of collection

On September 16, 2014, the head of the Goyang District Tax Office requested the defendant to pay the amount equivalent to the amount of delinquent local taxes by September 24, 2014 (the notice demanding the collection of seized evidence No. 5) based on the above seizure, but the defendant sent a peremptory notice to demand the defendant to pay by October 7, 2014 the amount of delinquent local taxes by no later than September 24, 2014 (the notice demanding the collection of seized evidence No. 5) but failed to comply with the demand for collection after sending it on October 25, 2014.

2. The defendant's obligation to pay the collection money to the plaintiff

When the head of a tax office notifies of seizure as a disposition for arrears, he/she may request the third debtor to perform the obligation on behalf of the creditor who is the delinquent amount, within the scope of the delinquent amount, and when the third debtor fails to perform the obligation, he/she may file a lawsuit against the third debtor (see Article 41(1) of the National Tax Collection Act and Article 45(2)

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 91,176,760 won and damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the day following the day of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment.

3. Conclusion

Since the defendant is liable to pay the above amount to the plaintiff, the claim of this case has been filed to seek the performance thereof.