On August 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million for larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and a fine of KRW 1 million for larceny at the Suwon District Court on September 19, 2012, and on April 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months at the Seoul Western District Court on April 23, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 1, 2014, and on September 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for 4 months at the Suwon District Court Sung-nam Branch for larceny and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for 2 years for larceny, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2014, and the same electric power as the current suspended sentence was at least 17 times.

1. On October 17, 2014, at around 14:56, the Defendant: (a) stolen the Victim D’s (E) located on the display stand in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, with a ear dog equal to KRW 80,00,000 at the market price of the victim’s possession.

2. At around 14:10 on October 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s G management “HE” located in the Sinpo City F with the display stand, 126,700 won in total; and (b) subsequently, the Defendant stolen the victim’s market value at the display stand.

3. On February 17, 2015, around 1619 to 16:27, the Defendant stolen the victim’s name in the “K,” located on the display stand in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, with a total of KRW 87,890,00 in the market value of the victim’s ownership.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Written statements of D, L, G and J;

3. Statement of seizure by each police;

4. Photographs records (fields, CCTV images) and investigation reports (CCTV analysis);

5. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (not before disposition and report on results of confirmation).

6. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment.

1. The grounds for sentencing of imprisonment with labor under Article 332 and Article 329 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the value of the stolen goods is the small amount.