However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 11. 21. 03:40경 울산 남구 B건물 앞 도로에서, 울산남부경찰서 C파출소 소속 경찰관 경장 D(남, 33세)과 순경 E가 “술 취한 사람이 지나가는 차에 달려들어서 위험하다”는 내용의 112신고를 받고 출동하여 도로 중간에 앉아 있는 피고인을 길가로 옮기고 피고인에게 다친 곳은 없는지, 인적사항이 무엇인지 질문하자 경찰관들에게 “븅신 새끼들아”라고 욕설하고, 재차 경찰관들이 “인적사항만 파악하고 돌아갈 테니 주민번호 불러주세요”라고 설명하였음에도 “니가 뭔데”라고 말하고, 이에 경장 D이 피고인에게 “우리가 당신 친구가 아니니 반말하지 마세요”라고 말하자 화를 내며 주먹으로 경장 D의 얼굴 부위를 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months.

3. Fully considering all the circumstances indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, the degree of tangible power exercised by the Defendant, and the duration of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.