A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

(b).

【Defendant B was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on August 29, 2014 and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Cheongju District Court on May 13, 2016. On September 1, 2017, Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Cheongju District Court’s military mountain support, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 9, 2017.

1. The Defendants committed the joint crime of 2017 Gohap 171: The Defendants committed a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (in the event of coercion, etc. of commercial sex acts) on January 2017, 201 as the disabled of class 3 with intellectual disability with the intelligence index of 50 to 70, the Defendants conspired to raise living expenses, etc. by making use of this fact to the victims of commercial sex acts (the term "recognives"), with the knowledge that the victims of sexual traffic (the age of 20) sent to the police officer in the middle of January 2017.

Defendant

A around June 9, 2017, on the ground that Defendant B and Defendant C were residing in the Gunsan City G and 204, on the ground that a person who suffered damage caused a bad horse to Defendant A, her hand, her hand when the victim's knifs the victim's knifs the victim's knife, and assault the victim's knife on the part of the victim's knife.

After that, Defendant A may impose money on the victim, who was frightened due to the above assault, among Defendant B and Defendant C, with the IMocom 202 at H around Jun. 13, 2017, Defendant A, who got sexual intercourses in the motherel with the payment of money in advance to attract male through the internal-rating crypt.

Recognizing to the purport that “it was the same attitude that would inflict any injury on the victim unless the conditions remain.”

Therefore, the victims of drinking cage will remain under the inevitable conditions.

On June 13, 2017, Defendant A had the victim contact with the male purchase through a mobile phone hosting application, and around 17:00.