구상금
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff alleged that the plaintiff suffered flood damage on July 200, when the defendant (appointed parties) and the defendant C (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant et al.") suffered flood damage, the plaintiff did not receive flood compensation on the wind that the public official in charge prepares a false non-resident certificate.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay KRW 98,00,000 to the Plaintiff.
2. In addition to unclear grounds for the instant claim, in a case where the claim for indemnity is deemed a claim for indemnity, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff had the right to claim for reimbursement against the Defendants, and even in a case of a claim for damages based on a tort, according to the respective entries and arguments in subparagraphs 4 through 6, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendants for damages arising from a tort (the Daejeon District Court Decision 2009Gadan17079), but the Plaintiff was sentenced to dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim on January 14, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive as the Plaintiff’s appeal and appeal were dismissed.
The plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.