The Defendant was aware of the victim C and his/her children’s activities without school support. On December 2, 2014, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, operated D companies with the victim who met the victim during the group of his/her parents.

At this time, the fine was responsible for construction, and the construction is scheduled to be completed after one month.

The money to be used for the construction cost in charge is required, and 2.5 million won is invested, the principal of the investment shall be returned within one month and 1.5 million won shall be paid as profits.

“Falsely speaking.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, he was planning to use it for the payment of living expenses or the existing debt, and there was no idea to use it for construction expenses. Around December 2014, the Defendant was unable to receive money from the injured party, and the bank balance was limited to KRW 20,00,000 before borrowing money from the injured party, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 17,000,000 of the national tax in arrears since 2013. Since March 2014, the personal debt was in arrears, and the credit rating was 10,000,000,000, and there was no other property or revenue, and there was no intention or ability to complete payment even if the Defendant received money from the injured party due to the lack of any other property or revenue.

Around December 16, 2014, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received KRW 2,00,000 from the account (Account Number E) of the Nonghyup Bank (Account Number E) under the Defendant’s name from that time to February 4, 2016, and, even though there was no fact that the Defendant had received an actual construction request on 54 occasions from that time, from that time, from February 4, 2016, the Defendant was planning to make an investment in the subordinate Corporation, or to conceal that the Defendant was a plan to use the victim for repayment of other obligations, not for the construction site as explained by the victim, or that the Defendant was a plan to receive the construction cost immediately, even though there was no intention or ability to change.