2. Each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant, while causing injury to the victim and threatening the victim, which is a dangerous thing, is deemed to have been committed in light of the content and result of the relevant crime, the degree and degree of injury, etc.

In addition, the possibility of criticism is high by lowering each of the crimes of this case during the period of probation without being subject to criminal punishment for the same crime even though the defendant was punished for the same crime.

On the other hand, however, the defendant shows his attitude to reflect on his mistake, and he agreed with the victim.

In addition, each of the crimes of this case is serious damage.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Considering the circumstances unfavorable or favorable to the defendant as above, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, and all other factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the prosecutor's assertion above is without merit, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible and it does not seem unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.