2. The instant accident affected the victim’s death and the result is serious, and the Defendant was unable to reach an agreement with his/her bereaved family members up to the trial of the case.

However, the defendant is the first offender, and the mistake of the crime of this case is divided, and seriously reflects it.

In this case, the victim's negligence was caused by an accident that occurred while walking along the road along which the victim was under the influence of drinking, and immediately after the accident, the victim made efforts to rescue the victim by making a report to 119 immediately on the part of the defendant immediately after the accident and implementing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but some of the circumstances may be considered in that the victim died.

Defendant

As vehicles are covered by comprehensive insurance, the defendant deposited KRW 20 million for the bereaved family members in addition to the payment of insurance money to the victims' bereaved family members.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.