2. In light of the judgment, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the fact that the defendant did not have the same criminal record is the favorable reason for sentencing, the fact that the victim did not have to recover damage and did not agree with the victim, and the fact that the acquired vehicle is sold to the large-sized vehicle is not good for sentencing.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.