When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall lend any electronic financial transaction access medium while demanding, demanding or promising the consideration therefor.

On September 2016, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 2,00,000 in return for lending the check card under the name of the Defendant from a person who was in the name of the Defendant for a period of three months from the person in the name of the Defendant, and notified the name in the name in an irregular place of the name in the name of the Defendant, one check card connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (B) and the password.

As a result, the defendant demanded or promised to demand compensation for the lending of electronic financial transaction access media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Report on internal investigation by each police station (report on the result of execution of a financial warrant - Attachment of images of some accounts, such as financial transaction information, etc. - Video data);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of a note entered in the account number;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;