If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 14, 2011, the Defendant driven the Ortoba, which is around 11:40 on September 14, 201, driven the Ortoba, and proceeded one lane three lanes prior to the Oral Library in the Dong-dong, Daejeon at about 70km in the speed from the Ham 4 to the home-pller direction, and continued to proceed to the intersection in accordance with the straight line. The Defendant was due to the occupational negligence that the Defendant was trying to go to go to the right-hand side of the victim C(the age 42) who was left left at the right-hand side without sufficiently examining the movement of the victim C(the age 42) driving, which was going to turn to the left-hand side of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, light dump finites, etc. requiring the victim C to receive approximately two-day medical treatment for the victim E (the victim E (the 13-year old age), and light dump finites, etc. requiring approximately two-day medical treatment for the victim F (the 42-year age), respectively, for the victim F (the finite, the 42-year age) who was on the same car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Reports on each traffic accident and photographs on accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.