When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On March 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was removed from E, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on the 112 report in front of the hospital C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and was dispatched to the site on March 17, 2017, and the Defendant was removed from E, who was dispatched to the site.

Pro-Japanese is a kind of relationship.

Rer’s parents expressed a bath “Ihman Ih,” and assaulted the face of the above E one time as a drinking, and the side of a bridge as a sloping.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

2. On March 17, 2017, after the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to interference with the above performance of official duties, the Defendant damaged the police officer’s failure to wear the pedal, while going to transfer from the D District F in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to the Southern Police Station, and damaged the police officer’s failure to repair the goods used by the public office by walking the back door of the patrol 23th level, which belongs to and is being used in the said D District, even if the back door of the patrol 23th level, the public goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the point of obstructing the performance of official duties in relation to criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; and Article 141 of the fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes prescribed for a crime causing damage to goods for public use, the punishment of which is heavier);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires the police officer's face in the course of performing official duties, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is grave, the police officer was unable to resist in the emergency room before the initial dispatch of the police officer, and the police officer was involved in interference with the performance of official duties, and the police officer spaths from the earth to the police station.