beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고합398

상해치사

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In around 1997, the Defendant reported the marriage with the victim D (the age of 35) and was living together with the married couple, and the agreement was reached with the victim around 199. Since February 2, 2013, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the agreement between the victim and the living together with the victim.

At around 23:00 on June 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and went back to the house after completing the work; (b) reported that he was under the influence of alcohol; and (c) continued to drink on the male problem, drinking, etc. of the victim and the victim; and (d) reported to the police at home, “I will report to the police at home. I will report to I.D. at home”; (c) the body of the victim who was under the influence of drinking and flab by drinking, and (d) caused the death of the victim by driving the victim, such as flabing the victim’s chest and part of the breast and part of the ship, and making the victim flab by drinking the victim, such as flabing the victim’s chest and part of the flab, thereby causing a pulmone disorder due to damage to both boness.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site and photographs of carcasses;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, including a written result of autopsy, a written result of autopsy, a written request for appraisal, a written request for appraisal, and a written request for autopsy;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 259(1) of the relevant Article of the Criminal Code as to the crime of this case [the scope of applicable sentences] 3 to 30 years of imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment] 4 to 7 years of imprisonment, violent crime group, and general injury Type 3 (the occurrence of death): imprisonment with prison labor for 6 years ] The crime of this case resulted in the death of the victim by causing bodily injury to the victim while the victim was living together with the victim who was in dispute with the victim living together, and the method of the crime of this case was either unilateral or non-discriminatory assaulted against the victim, thereby causing the death of the victim. As such, the method of the crime of this case was limited to one-way and non-discriminatory assaulting the victim to the victim, thereby cutting the bones of the bones of dyssis, the maloppy of both abolitions, the poppynosis of the victim, the act of cutting down the victim from the outside of the