On July 2013, the Defendant opened a game of “G Gameland” with the Defendant’s Eastern E and the Gyeonggi-si, F, the Gyeonggi-si, and conspired in order to install and operate game products different from the contents of the rating.

Therefore, the Defendant provided the above place as a game site from July 17, 2013 to February 2014, and lent KRW 15 million to D as a fund for purchasing the game machine on August 8, 2013. E around July 2013, after registering the said “G Gameland” game in the name of the Defendant from the so-called “G Game City” game in the name of the Defendant and allowing D to actually operate the said game site. D from November 201, 2013 to February 17, 2014, “G Gameland” in the above “G Gameland” game was classified in a state without an example and chain, and without an automatic function, it was possible for D to use the said game machine as a customer by installing 50 parts of the game products, which added automatic and automatic progress function.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with E and D, provided game products with contents different from the rated game products.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant leased the F-M building from H and thereafter leased it again to D around April 2013, and D operated the game site from April 2, 2013 to the above building. On July 17, 2013, the Defendant was controlled on the ground that he provided game products different from those classified on the game product. The Defendant lent KRW 15 million to D around August 2013 and received KRW 100,000 per day from D. Meanwhile, D was rated at the above location.