However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 19:40 on October 13, 2013, the Defendant threatened the victim by threatening-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Defendant’s home with the Defendant’s 1st floor that the victim D (the 12-year-old age), who is his/her his/her father, provided two friendships and meals, and by drinking so that he/she did not fit the victim, but sticked to the floor board without facing the victim, and then threatening the victim by threatening him/her with the following: “The knick, which is a dangerous object in the kitchen, knick, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site reports and criminal implements photographs;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of imprisonment shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act has a depth of his mistake, and efforts are made to recover the relation with the victim, the defendant has no major criminal record of the suspension of execution, the victim's mother has expressed his intention to rear the victim, etc., and the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended, but the probation shall be ordered together to be put on probation for one year in order to prevent recidivism, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order;