However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a period of six months, due to a crime of interference with the execution of official duties at the Suwon Friwon, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 21st of the same month.

1. From September 29, 2017 to around 04:00 on September 29, 2017 to around 04:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the convenience store in Osan City B; and (b) at the victim D, the owner of the above convenience store, who was disposing of goods, reported to the police.

"........ the victim's convenience store business was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbance, such as marching, by a customer who was at the above convenience store and throw away from the above convenience store.

2. At around 04:555 on the same day, the Defendant was kneek for questioning of the Defendant’s personal information from F after having received a 112 report to the effect that the Defendant was free of disturbance, and having been dispatched to the site after having received a 112 report to the effect that he was free of disturbance, and that he was kneek for the Defendant’s personal information from F.

After the words “F”, it was assaulted at one time by the F to display the F’s face as a drinking with his own f’s own f’s face.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each written statement of G and D;

1. Notification to the department related to the report of the 112 case, of the part of the assault;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (reports on the date of separate confirmation), investigation report (reports attached to the same type of judgment, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is the criminal law.