The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in holding that all of the facts charged in this case is guilty on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to the autonomy of confession as alleged in the grounds of

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal is permitted for the wrongful grounds for sentencing. Thus, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.