A. Defendant: The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor: The lower court’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant recognized the crime and agreed with the victim are favorable circumstances, and the defendant has been punished several times due to violent crimes, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to double crime, etc. are disadvantageous.

Considering such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be said that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or is unreasonable due to the absence of such circumstances.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.