For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the violation of the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, Etc. among the facts charged of this case

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on door-to-door sales in violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.