If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 7, 2016, at the court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court No. 562, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the loan lawsuit 537863, the following facts: (a) the Defendant read the contents of the annual salary contract in the name of the Defendant at the office of the branch office in the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court of Law No. 562, on November 1, 2010, and (b) signed the annual salary contract in the name of the Defendant, and sent it to the Seoul head office via the employee C through the employee C, the Plaintiff’s agent’s “It is necessary that the annual salary work contract should be concluded by the witness,” and without any permanent domicile, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his/her memory.

Accordingly, the defendant, who was a witness who took an oath under the law, made a false statement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statements of the witness C and D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Written appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order

1. The gist of the allegation is that the Defendant did not sign the annual salary contract and even if so, signed the contract.

Even if they were believed to be true, they testified to be true.

2. According to the evidence as seen earlier, it is recognized that C personally filled out the blank space of the annual salary contract in which C is printed and then signed by the Defendant.

Even if the Defendant had testified to the effect that “I will not memory” or “I will feel,” it was somewhat old, and that the Defendant testified to the effect that I would not clearly prepare in the testimony, and that I would not have signed.

In addition, even if based on one defendant's statement, it is only .