beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고단956

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness and testified at the Daejeon District Court court located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, on April 19, 2012, in the above court of appeal, including the name map of building 2011Na14105 filed by Plaintiff D against Defendant E.

In fact, around November 2003, the Defendant, F, and D received a successful bid of KRW 480 million for G land and three-story buildings located in the field of rice production (hereinafter “G real estate located in Seosan”), and around January 9, 2004, the Defendant, F, and E were registered as the sole owner of the Defendant for the purpose of securing expenses related to G real estate located in Seosan, but KRW 50 million out of KRW 80 million for the Defendant and F, E, and 30 million for the real estate located in the Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H, which was financed by the Defendant and F, E-3 as collateral, was deposited into a deposit account in the name of D to be used as expenses related to G real estate, and the remainder of KRW 30 million was used individually by the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant testified to the effect that E does not make any investment in money in connection with G’s real estate at the time of debate that “three persons, such as witness, F, and D, etc., were awarded a successful bid for G’s real estate at the time of debate, and the witness, F, and E obtained an additional loan of KRW 80 million with the security of H’s real estate located at Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon. This eight million won is divided and used equally by the witness, F, and E, and on January 9, 2004. On January 9, 2004, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “five thousand won, such as the witness, F, and D, deposited by the witness at the time of funeral.”

As such, the Defendant made a false statement against his memory and raised a perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E.