However, each of the above two years against the Defendants from the date of the final judgment.

1. On February 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received cash amounting to KRW 80,00 from the police officer responsible for regulating male customers, and (b) assisted sexual traffic by having E, a female employee, engage in sexual intercourse once; and (c) mediated sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B, as the owner of the building set forth in the above 1. D 69, the Defendant B arranged sexual traffic as described in the above 1. Paragraph (1) by leasing the above building with the knowledge that A had engaged in sexual traffic in the above building.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement of E and A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the entire certificate of registration;

1. Defendant A of the relevant criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Defendant B: Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants subject to suspended sentence: The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448

1. Defendant A [Determination of Type] There is no person who is subject to special sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] type 2 (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic through business and receipt, etc. of consideration] [the scope of the punishment] [the basic area] mitigated elements of imprisonment from six months to one year and four months (the basic area] mitigated elements of imprisonment: short-term business, serious reflect [whether probation is suspended]] comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the reasons for suspension of execution - there is no major reason for each main reason: positive factors: The fact that there is a serious reflect [decision of sentence] degree of fine; the fact that the Defendant misleads and reflects the fact that the period of the business of arranging sexual traffic is short; the defendant's age, environment, criminal records, relationship, business period and size of business; the method of committing the crime; the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case as ordered by the order of punishment.

2. Defendant B [Type Decision] sexual traffic subject to the age of 19 years or more.