As the head of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), the Defendant, as the main trading company, is the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, the 200 K 20-be supplied to the S&T industry, has overall control over the duties of requesting testing and analysis to an authorized agency, and submitting test results received from an authorized agency to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, etc.

When the Defendant received a request to submit a test report on the materials and chemical properties of the above parts, the Defendant forged the test report of the relevant parts on the grounds that the test result falls short of the standard value, the test request cost, and the time of payment promotion, etc., and issued it to the quality-related inspector as if they were duly formed, and had the result delivered it to the quality-related inspector as if they were duly formed, and had the Defendant received the pass from the relevant inspector to supply the parts.

1. Around January 2009, the Defendant made a copy of the original test report in the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the name of the Busan and Ulsan District Small and Medium Business Administration, which was previously kept in custody at the G office located in H office located in the Busan and Ulsan District, and made a copy of the report by inserting the number, size, etc. on the above sexual report, and then preparing the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the Busan and Ulsan District

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged the test report under the name of the Administrator of Busan and Ulsan District Small and Medium Business Administration, which is an official document related to the certification of facts without authority, and forged the test report of the official document five times from the above date to May 2013, as stated in attached Table 1, and forged the test report of the official document more than 260 times in total, which is a private document, on a total of 265 occasions.

2. On January 19, 2009, the Defendant’s use of forged test results and interference with business operations shall be at the office of the above company, and the facts shall be at the official body.