However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On October 5, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of road traffic law at the Suwon Flag Flag method (driving) and on August 22, 2008, a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime at the same court on August 22, 2008, respectively, and on March 27, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million by the same court on March 27, 2014, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4.5 million for a violation of road traffic law.

Criminal facts

1. On January 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven BM5 vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.071% from the 1km section to the roads in front of the “marn restaurant for pots and pots,” which is located in the Geum-si, Simsan-si. From January 26, 2017, the Defendant driven BM5 vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.071% in the blood content.

2. The defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaging in driving service of the above SM5 car.

Defendant 1 driven the said SM5 vehicle while under the influence of approximately 0.071% of alcohol concentration among blood transfusions on the day indicated in the above paragraph 1, and driven the said SM5 vehicle along the four-lane road in front of the “slurt” as indicated in paragraph 1 of the above paragraph, the road was driven in the same way as the substitute room in the parallel parallel.

On the front of that place, since the victim C driver's D car stops due to the vehicle stop signal, there was a duty of care to safely drive the car while properly operating the operation of the vehicle by properly operating the brake system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected the previous week while neglecting it, and was negligent in proceeding with the Defendant, and received the back part of the said car as the front part of the said SM5 car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as scarcity and tension, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Preparation of inspection of E;