2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and the driving distance is relatively short is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant was punished for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act three times. In particular, considering all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, circumstance of the crime, and circumstance after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s above assertion by the Defendant is without merit, on the ground that the lower court’s punishment is deemed appropriate and it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.