2. In full view of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, but the social harm caused by sexual traffic, the fact that the women were 16 years old and older, the defendant's sexual traffic was contacted several times of sexual traffic, even if the defendant's sexual traffic was committed only once, the defendant's sexual traffic was contacted with the female involved in sexual traffic, the equity in similar cases, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.