도로교통법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on February 8, 2017, the Defendant parked C M&A at a crosswalk in front of the Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-do, Sungwon-gun, Gyeongwon-gun, a road crossing (applicable Article 156: subparag. 1, Article 32 subparag. 1 of the Road Traffic Act). The judgment of “Article 14(1), (3), (4), and Article 16 of the Act on Procedure for the Judgment on the Judgment of the Supreme Court” and Article 455(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (b) where a legitimate formal trial is requested by the Defendant who was tried at the request of the head of the police station at the request of the police station; (c) on the grounds that the request for a formal trial is the same as the indictment, and (d) the judgment of the chief of the police station is to be judged by the trial procedure; (e) on the contrary, if the judgment becomes final and conclusive due to the limit of the period of request for formal trial, then the judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Therefore, the indictment of this case constitutes double prosecution, and it is so decided as per Disposition pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act.