The Defendant on February 1, 2008, Seoul Southern District Court sentenced three months of imprisonment, three months of imprisonment, and one year of imprisonment, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 30, 2008, paroled on May 28, 2008 and passed on June 28, 2008.

1. On August 11, 2010, the Defendant committed the Victim AR with the victim AR, running AH Co., Ltd. (Before changing the trade name on January 10, 201; hereinafter, referred to as AH Co., Ltd.) operated by the Defendant on the third floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 1, 201, the Defendant would pay the victim AR with the benefit of convenience, “AV facility construction works and ancillary civil engineering works in the ASEAN-gun AV facility construction in the Chungcheongbuk-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.”

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant entered into a contract with AW Medical Foundation, the main owner of the construction project, to receive the construction cost with the loan fund after the completion of the construction project, and had been unable to receive the construction cost before the completion of the construction project, and all other construction projects that had been under way had been under the influence of the enemy. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the fluent money or to properly carry out the construction project even if it had no specific property

Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and caused the victim to do so from August 14, 2010 to August 31, 2010, the victim acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of KRW 60 million, including the rupture destruction work.

2. Crimes against the victim AX;

A. On August 23, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around August 23, 2010, the victim AY operated AY at the office of the foregoing AH Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AY”); (b) lent KRW 10 million to the victim X for the construction of 80 household units of the AZ apartment in Gyeongcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-si; and (c) thus,

“.....”

However, in fact, the apartment construction project was in an influent state of its implementation, and all other construction projects that had been carried out have been influence, and it is against the victim without any particular property.