However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 9, 2017, the Defendant attempted suicide on the street of the member of Ansan-si, a member of the Gu of Ansan-si, with his or her wife and his or her horse dispute, and attempted suicide at a method of avoiding a dogb in his or her mother's load, but received a notification from the police who called up to 112 and received a report, and led the police to voluntarily accompany the police box located in the same Gu B at the level of protective measures.

At around 23:54 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) tried suicide in front of the same day; (b) reported the identification of the police officer and the interview with the police officer; and (c) assaulted the scene of the police box, such as cutting the external wall of the police box, cutting the stop of the police box, cutting the stop of the police officer D, and cutting the stop; and (d) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (i.e., interference with performance of official duties) (i., June to one year and six months) (i.e., a person subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] of the instant crime, but the nature of the instant crime is poor; however, it is not possible to take into account the circumstances; and the Defendant has no specific history of punishment in addition to punishment once every time.