However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 28, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of “C” in the Seoul Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s operation, kept a registration number plate in custody due to the Defendant’s delinquency in payment of automobile tax on a car known to the Defendant, printed out a DNA number plate on the paper A4 by using a computer, and forged a vehicle registration number plate by attaching the above paper on the front number plate and fixing it in a transparent tape. From that time to November 7, 2016, the Defendant exercised a forged air mark by operating the said car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records (voluntary submission), list of seizure, evidence of seizure, and vehicle photographs;

1. Article 238 (2) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 238 of the same Act) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of exercising forged air defense);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected, and the fact that there is no previous conviction in the same kind);

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;