If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. 재물손괴 피고인은 2014. 1. 5. 03:20경 고양시 일산동구 중앙로 1275번길 14-43에 있는 ‘고양세무서’ 앞 노상에서, 그곳에 주차된 피해자 C 소유의 D 포르테쿱 승용차의 트렁크 부분을 발로 차 수리비 898,982원이 들도록 재물을 손괴하였다.

2. The Defendant: (a) committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties at the time, place, as set forth in Paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) committed an act of assaulting a police officer by assaulting a police officer, such as, at the time, time, and place; and (c) arrested him as a flagrant offender under suspicion of property damage and damage to G from the position F of the Yongsan Police Station E District Police Station, and a police officer, who was dispatched to the scene by destroying and damaging the said car; and (d) b) knee, knee, kne

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Each police protocol against C, G, and F;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation, a report on investigation (referring to a statement of the victim and submission of a written agreement);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that there is no record of criminal punishment for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that there is no evidence of criminal punishment for sentencing with the victim C, and that some funds have been deposited for the victimized police officers.