beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.17 2015고단642

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and three months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”), the Defendants conspired to photograph the victim H ( South and 46 years of age), who was the president of G Co., Ltd., an affiliated company of the E Group, with the E Group, even though they had married, with the knowledge that he had a sexual intercourse with Defendant B’s friendship I while having a sexual intercourse, despite having already been married.

The Defendants, around October 2008, set up a special camera at the seat of Jtel 1401, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Jtel 1401, and around that time, taken pictures of screen pictures that the victim had sexual intercourse with I and returned to Baltel.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to take the body of the victim who could cause a sense of sexual shame by using a special camera, which is a mechanical device similar to a camera.

2. Defendant B violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint conflict) committed a sexual intercourse with the victim on Oct. 1, 2010, after taking the victim’s balkic image after taking the victim’s balkic image as above. On Aug. 2012, Defendant B offered to the victim a loan of KRW 10 million to KRW 20 million to KRW 20 million to the victim, but refused to take money and valuables by threatening the victim by using the victim’s balkic image.

Accordingly, from June 23, 2014, Defendant B provided and received a Kakakao Stockholm text message with the victim on July 4, 2014, and promised to talk with the victim on July 4, 2014, in the 1413 L hotel located in K in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and induced the victim. The Defendants found the victim to the hotel room at around 17:00 on the same day. At that time, Defendant B, who confirmed that the victim was in the place, was the first place to have the victim talked with the victim.

Since then, Defendant A.