If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. Around 10:20 on December 2, 201, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (influence, 51 years of age) to the victim E (influence) (influence) at the point of convenience located in Sogjin-gu, Sogjin-gu, Seoul, with the intent of “I will die by murdering. I will die by attempted murder. I will die by murder.” Influence, the Defendant assaulted the victim in a way with the right side, left hand, and face of the victim by hand.

2. On December 5, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on the front of the 23th century, on the ground that the victim G (n, 23 years of age) did not properly teach the way on the road in front of the 201st century, the Defendant saw the victim’s head at his hand beyond the floor in leaving the floor; (b) walked about 10 times the victim’s bridge and course; (c) taken about 10 times the head of the victim’s head on the 10th hand; and (d) took an eye of the victim’s face, with the face of the victim, he sawd about 2 weeks of the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. An interrogation protocol of E;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was that the Defendant was absent on two consecutive occasions (on May 8, 2013, June 19, 2013) on the date of trial, and revised the trial date without the attendance of the Defendant pursuant to Articles 458(2) and 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

According to the above evidence, in light of the facts found in the judgment of the defendant, and the circumstances of this case, the fines specified in the summary order cannot be deemed to be heavy, and thus the defendant shall be sentenced to the punishment as set forth in the order.