A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendant

A is the representative director of the LAD, defendant B is the vice head of the same company, and defendant C is the employees of the same company.

On October 28, 2015, the Defendants: (a) around 15:20, the Daejeon Seo-gu New Construction Co., Ltd., (b) leased and used the construction materials of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (c) the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., which was subcontracted by the members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (d) the Co., Ltd., (e., (e.g., the number of members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (e., the number of members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd.), and (e) the number of members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (e.g., the number of members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (e., the number of members of the Committee for the Settlement of Co., Ltd., (e.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and Articles 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the said Act;

1. As to the defendant B and C, each fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Defendants detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (in the case of Defendant B and C, the period computed by converting the amount of KRW 100,000 into one day);

1. Defendant B and C of suspended sentence: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that there are extenuating circumstances for the commission of the crime and agreed with the victim, and that the above Defendants repented wrong facts).