The Defendant, even though he was aware that he was an officer of the commission of the crime of telephone financing fraud (hereinafter referred to as “singing”), received a proposal from a person without his name to collect and deliver the money to the Defendant using the instant Megs Megs Megs Megs Megs Megs, and accepted the above proposal to facilitate the commission of the instant Megs phishing crime.

On April 10, 2018, 12:20 on April 10, 2018, 2018, the Defendant misrepresented a national bank employee by phoneing to the victim E’s cell phone at the victim E’s location, and “The credit rating may be improved if he/she obtained a bank loan in the name of Neng bank and repaid the loan in a variety of times, but upon the enhancement of credit rating, he/she would be allowed to obtain a loan of up to 40 million won at a low interest rate.”

On April 16, 2018, the Defendant received an instruction from a person who was unable to receive his name, and received an shopping white paper containing 6 million won in cash from the injured party in front of Seoul Fro, and then moved the shopping white paper to a non-personally non-personally non-personally, Incheon around the following day and delivered it to the non-personally non-personally delivered book.

Accordingly, the defendant could easily commit the crime of fraud of a person without a name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on the results of analysis of digital evidence;

1. Details of conversations related to crimes among the data on the restoration of sirens;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear statements on damage situations from damage victims);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Articles 32(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of aiding and abetting is against the time of committing the instant crime.

There is no punishment imposed in Korea.

However, Bophishing crimes are planned and organized against many unspecified victims.