[Criminal Power] The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on July 24, 2014 and two years for a suspended sentence.

8.1. The above ruling becomes final and conclusive and is currently in the grace period.

around 16:35 on August 15, 2014, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 2939”, was used under the influence of alcohol on the first floor of multi-households located in Dobong-gu, Seoul Dobong Police Station, as well as the security guards D, etc. of the Seoul Dobong Police Station, who called out after receiving a report, was able to take the c police box.

In addition, the defendant's house is called as the patrol lane, and the above D et al. took the defendant into the patrol vehicle up to the two-way subway stations No. 4 of subway lines, and he laid the defendant into the patrol vehicle and laid the defendant into the subway station.

However, in front of the 2nd exit of the said pair of fields in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant, while taking a desire to the said D, knee of the said D, knee and walked once, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order.

At around 20:00 on October 7, 2014, the Defendant 2014, the Defendant did not have the entrance sign inside the Gststro in the Gstro, operated by the victim F (56 years of age) in Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern District E, and the victim blick away from the shop, and blicked the victim by blicking the victim over the enclosed floor by blicking the victim's head and head into several times and by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A victim's photograph;

1. Investigation report (Investigation into the counter-party telephone);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, amounts of dispositions and results confirmation reports;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing among concurrent crimes is for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments for each crime).