If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a worker in daily employment.

At around 18:00 on June 26, 2012, the Defendant ordered two-person, three-way, one-way, one-way, and one-way drinking at C restaurant located in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the food value.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as if he could pay the food value, did his speech and behavior, received food, etc. from the victim, and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to 24,000 won of the food value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Text receipt;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;