When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 21:30 on October 17, 2016, the Defendant respondeded to the 1112 Report of Si expenses that had been between the Defendant and E on the same day, and assaulted the Defendant at one time as the Defendant’s hand to F in the circumstances where the Defendant was affiliated with the said D Area by “I know that he was drinking the money, she is dead, she is cut off, she is cut off, she is cut off, she is cut off, she is not a police box.” The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, recommended the Defendant under the influence of alcohol to look back the alcohol after her, and instructed the investigation procedure, and assaulted the Defendant at the same time as the Defendant’s hand breath at the far left part of the F.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each investigation report, 112 Reporting Report List,

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CDs, such as field photographs, CCTV images inside the D District, images taken by a police officer by a mobile phone, and CCTV images inside the D District;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be selected by a fine in consideration of the fact that he/she has no criminal record of the same kind, makes a confession and reflect

In this context, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime shall be determined as per the order.