A. As to the shares of Defendant B, E, G, L, M, andO, each of which is 4/195:

B. Defendant C.

A. At the time of indicating the claim, the Plaintiff, the owner of WW 1,157 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) held title trust of 1/5 shares out of the instant land (hereinafter “net X shares”), and the network X completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said shares on May 9, 1956.

Defendant B as a son of the net X, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 2/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the net X’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the inheritance net’s capital increase, 4/39 out of the Defendant net’s capital increase.

The Plaintiff terminated the title trust with respect to the above Defendants’ co-ownership shares through the delivery of a duplicate of the complaint. As such, the Plaintiff exercised a real right claim based on ownership and demanded the said Defendants to implement each of the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to co-ownership as stated in the order of the said Defendants among the instant land.

(b) Article 208 (3) 2, the main sentence of Article 150 (3) and the main sentence of Article 150 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. On May 9, 1956, the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant land, indicated the claim, held title trust with the network X over one-five shares out of the instant land, and the network X completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said shares.

Defendant C was succeeded to 2/39 out of the net X equity as a female of the net X.

As the Plaintiff terminated the title trust with respect to Defendant C’s co-ownership among the instant land by serving a duplicate of the complaint, the Plaintiff’s claim based on ownership is based on ownership.