감나무발취 수거 등 청구
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. G, H, Defendant C, Defendant C, Selection, J, K, L, M, N, andO were succeeded to the shares of G on August 31, 2004, after G died on August 31, 2004, G was succeeded to the instant land and its ground reduction trees, and H, Defendant C, Selection, J, K, L, M, N, N, andO inherited the shares of H on October 6, 2008 and H, P, Q, M, M,V, M, N, and M were succeeded to the shares of H on the instant land and its ground reduction trees. < Amended by Act No. 8572, Oct. 6, 2008; Act No. 8577, Oct. 6, 2008>
B. The Plaintiffs: (a) purchased ownership on February 22, 2013, at the compulsory auction procedure with respect to two-one-one share of the instant land and 180 shares of C on the instant land and its ground trees; and (b) acquired ownership.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence No. 1, purport of whole pleadings
2. In order to preserve the instant land as one of the co-owners of the instant land, the Plaintiffs seek to gather a total of 180 grassium trees planted on the ground of the instant land to the Defendant and the designated parties.
The facts that the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs, the defendant, and the designated parties share 180 gs of the land of this case and 180 gs of the land of this case for each share are recognized as above. Since the defendant and the designated parties hold shares in the above 180 gs of trees, they cannot be viewed as exclusively using and making profits from the land of this case, they cannot seek a withdrawal as an act of preserving common properties by the same co-owner, and unlike others, the plaintiffs who own 21 gs of shares in the land of this case and 180 gs of the land of this case for each share, are not entitled to seek a withdrawal of the above gs of trees for the defendant and the designated parties who own the above land of this case for each share. Thus, the plaintiffs' claim is without merit.
Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.