However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:10 on April 1, 2014, the Defendant found “D main points” located in Ansan-si C while drunk, and she dumped the Defendant’s hand to the Defendant’s hand and did not start fire and dump the Defendant’s fire-fighting of existing structures without launching the oil tank (20-liter) at the place of receipt. The Defendant dumped the same as “D main points” and dumped the Defendant’s hand to the Defendant’s hand, and did not start fire-fighting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (on-site photographs);

1. The main sentence of Article 175 and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( normal consideration of the reasons for the suspension of execution);

1. The Defendant’s instant crime with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is likely to cause serious personal and material injury, and thus, the liability for such crime cannot be deemed to be light. However, the Defendant appears to recognize and reflect his mistake, the Defendant appears to have reached an agreement with F, and the Defendant did not have criminal records beyond the fine, and the Defendant selected a suspended sentence.