However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 17:30 on October 20, 2013, the Defendant was informed that he would be able to conduct the instant investigation by voluntarily moving to the district from the slope E belonging to the D District Unit, which was dispatched after receiving a report on 112, and he was able to conduct the instant investigation on October 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on the back seat of the patrol vehicle; (b) on the part of the slope E who driven, the Defendant was able to enter the front seat of the patrol vehicle; and (c) on the part of the assistant E who driven, the Defendant was able to look at the head of the said E on the hand floor, and (d) the head of the said E on the part of three occasions of drinking, and (e) on the part of the above E, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties concerning public safety and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a course is rendered for not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;