자동차운전면허취소처분취소 청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are
Therefore, the reasons for the statement concerning this case are as follows: "The criteria for disposition of revocation suspension of driver's license under Article 91 (1) [Attachment Table 28 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act is merely an internal process guidelines of administrative agencies that provide detailed matters such as processing standards and methods in handling affairs such as the revocation of driver's license and the suspension of validity of driver's license, and it is not externally binding upon citizens or courts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Du3017, Dec. 23, 2004); and [Attachment Table 28] 1. "Reduction of disposition standards" in [Attachment Table 28] 41.
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.